Sunday, January 11, 2009
First, Second, and Third
There has been some discussion about instead of having a winner takes all money pot, allowing for a second and third prize. One idea was to give third place their $20 back, second place gets $50, and first takes $210. It does give the winner less but may keep everyone still interested and motivated if there becomes an obvious front runner. What do you think?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I totally back that idea. I think the 2nd and 3rd place winners definitely deserve something. Plus, I don't mind splitting my winnings up. :)
ReplyDeleteHave I scared you all so bad that you think I'll be an "obvious front runner"!!??! LOL! I think that idea sounds great. are you all fasting for the big weigh in tomorrow! :) I think I'll go have a cookie.
ReplyDeletei like that idea too! smooches.
ReplyDelete(how mean is this, matt's german family sent us delicious christmas german cookies this week! imagine chocolate covered european heaven--that's what they are. i mean, er, that's what they look like. obviously i wouldn't EAT one...)
You see... to me, the money doesn't matter, just as long as I come in front of Jason Michael Reynolds. That's all I care about. If he's 0.001% behind me... that to me is winning! But, since we're on the subject of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd... as in the words of P90X "BRING IT!"
ReplyDelete@beede... I'll be sure to tell Grandma Nita you requested some of her delicious lumpia and pancit and adobo and rice. "Have some more, hon."
ReplyDeleteMaybe have one of the Spokanites mail you some Old European takeout with their homemade whip cream? :)
Whatever your percentage is brah, mine is better. :)
Did Jason just ask for some Chocolate covered Macadamia Nuts? And what? What was that? You want Portuguese Sausage as well?
ReplyDelete